Why does your advisor want to swap your annuity for a new one?
The call usually comes with the word “upgrade.” Newer contract. Better features. No tax bill. All of that can be true — and the swap can still be worse for you than doing nothing.
Consumer education, not investment advice. Paul Powell is not currently a licensed financial advisor.
Section 1035 of the tax code lets you trade one annuity for another without paying tax on the gains. That part is real. What often goes unsaid: the new contract typically starts a brand-new surrender period, and the person recommending it generally gets paid a fresh commission the day you sign. Some exchanges genuinely help you. The ones that don’t look identical from the outside.
The clock resets. So does the commission.
Start with what a 1035 exchange is, in plain English. It’s a provision in the U.S. tax code that lets you move money from one annuity contract into another without triggering a tax bill on the gains. The SEC describes it exactly that way — and adds the part the brochure tends to bury: “you may have to pay surrender charges on your old annuity if you are still within the surrender period.”
So there are two clocks running, and you need to see both.
Clock one is the old contract’s surrender schedule — the years-long window during which pulling your money out costs you a percentage. Clock two is the new contract’s surrender schedule, which starts the day the exchange settles. A swap doesn’t continue the old clock. It replaces it with a new one, usually running the full length again. The surrender schedule is the single most expensive fine print in the annuity world, and an exchange hands you a fresh one.
Now the compensation. Upfront commissions on variable annuities have been measured at roughly 6% on average and running as high as 16% at the top end, according to research by Egan, Ge and Tang. That commission is generally paid on the new contract — not on the years you already held the old one. Which means the economics of a swap look very different depending on which side of the table you’re sitting on. This is the same engine that drives annuity sales in the first place.
And the timing tends to be tidy. The “upgrade” conversation has a habit of arriving right around the point where the old contract’s surrender period has burned off — the moment your money finally became free to move without a penalty. You’re not imagining the pattern. Regulators built a rule around it.
That rule spells out the rest of the checklist too. Before an application goes to the insurance company, a registered principal has to review and approve it — no later than seven business days after the firm’s supervisory office receives a complete package — and the suitability review must weigh whether you’ll owe a surrender charge, whether you’ll be subject to the commencement of a new surrender period, whether you’ll lose existing benefits such as death or living-benefit riders, and whether you’ll face higher mortality-and-expense fees, advisory fees, or rider charges.
Read that list again. Every item on it is a way the exchange can cost you. The rule exists because those costs are common enough to supervise.
Here’s the honest other side, and it matters: some exchanges are genuinely good for the customer. Older contracts can carry high internal costs, riders you’re paying for and will never use, or investment menus that have aged badly. Moving out of an expensive legacy contract into a cheaper one can be a real win. What separates that from a re-sale isn’t the story you’re told. It’s whether the numbers survive a side-by-side comparison in writing.
Completely. That’s the point.
The 1035 exchange is written into the tax code. Recommending one is legal, disclosed, supervised, and routine. There are rules around it — FINRA’s principal-review requirement, Reg BI’s best-interest standard for brokers, state replacement forms and the NAIC best-interest model for annuity sales — and those rules are mostly about paperwork and process, not about whether the swap was the best available option for you. In FINRA’s 2025 regulatory oversight report, examiners still described firms recommending variable annuity exchanges that were unsuitable or not in customers’ best interest, producing higher fees, new surrender charges, and lost living-benefit riders. Legal, supervised, and still going wrong.
Ask what changed — for you. An exchange is supposed to be triggered by something in your life or something in the contract: a benefit you no longer need, a cost you can lower, a feature you actually require. If the honest answer is that the only thing that changed is the calendar — the surrender period ended, and now a new product is available — then the event that triggered this recommendation happened on their side of the table, not yours. FINRA’s own investor guidance puts it as plainly as anyone could: just because you can exchange your annuity doesn’t mean you should.
Make them build the comparison — before you sign anything
You don’t have to be an annuity expert to evaluate this. You have to be a person who requires a one-page comparison. Every variable in this decision is knowable and writable: total annual cost of the old contract versus the new one, the surrender schedule on each, the benefits you keep and the ones you surrender, and the compensation attached to the transaction.
Nothing here is confidential. The costs live in the prospectus and the contract. The compensation is disclosed to the firm and to the regulators. If a recommendation can’t survive being written down side by side, that tells you what the recommendation was. And before you take any of it on faith, pull the person’s public record on BrokerCheck — exchange-related complaints show up there — and run the whole conversation through the Method the same way you’d evaluate a new hire.
“Before I consider this exchange, please put in writing: (1) all compensation you, your firm, and any affiliate receive on the new contract; (2) a side-by-side of every annual cost on the old contract and the new one; (3) the full surrender schedule on each; (4) every benefit or rider I would give up; and (5) any annuity exchange you have recommended for me in the past 36 months.”
If the swap really is an upgrade, that document makes the case for them. If it isn’t, you just found out for free. So which one do you think you’re about to receive — and how long will it take to arrive? Add it to the twelve questions you should already be asking in writing.
You may also be interested in
Why you can’t get your money out for seven years
The surrender schedule, translated — and why a new contract restarts the entire clock.
Read →Why annuities get sold, and almost never bought
What the insurance company pays the day you sign, and how that shapes the pitch.
Read →The 12 Questions
The written due-diligence questions every advisor must answer — and what each answer means.
Read the guide →Tired of being sold the same product twice?
The Method replaces the sales conversation with written evidence — six steps, in order, free.